State v. Shannon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Defendant, Max Earl Shannon, was convicted of the crime of murder in the second degree. He appeals from the judgment.
Defendant bases his claim for a new trial on the ground that the court erred in refusing to allow defendant to exercise peremptory challenges against jurors after ten jurors had been passed for cause and had been duly sworn.
This appeal comes to us without a bill of exceptions or a settled case. The general rule is that no ruling or decision in the course of a trial can be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a settled case *103or bill of exceptions. Only those facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. SwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Shannon v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963