Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenson v. Glemaker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1935No. Nos. 30,547, 30,548Published

1DissentLoring, Justice

As I view the facts in this record they conclusively show that the plaintiff was guilty of negligence contributing proximately to his injury. It is just as conclusive that the defendant was negligent and unskillful in his driving. It must be conceded that Jenson gave no signal of his intention to cross the concrete highway. He 'does not claim that he did. He does claim that he looked back toward Rochester before making the turn and allowed one car from that direction to pass him before going or attempting to go across the pavement. At that time the defendant’s car was in full view, as can be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mahan v. McCoolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API