Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Alston

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1981No. 2331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Following appellant’s conviction on charges of robbery and possession of instruments of crime, Alston’s post-verdict motions were denied. An appeal of that denial came before us, and we affirmed on all issues except that concerning Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1100, hereinafter Rule 1100, Commonwealth v. Alston, 266 Pa.Super. 18, 402 A.2d 1056 (1979). We remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the Rule 1100 question. The lower court held for the Commonwealth at the evidentiary hearing, and this appeal followed. We disagree and reverse.

The facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. FuchsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. GoldwireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API