Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Western Union Tel. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 6, 1914No. 8843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Before Frank B. Gary, ‘J-> Action by Lawrence Bethea against Western Union Telegraph Company. From judgment for plaintiff, 'defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the' opinion. As to punitive damages: 77 S. C. 56;.48 S. C. 321. 77 S. C. 56; 60 S. C. 67; 70 S. C. 418; 86 S. C.-247; 90 S. C. 541.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

On the 19th of May, 1912, G. F. Bethea, a brother of Lawrence Bethea, delivered to the defendant the following telegram, addressed to the plaintiff at Dillon, S. C.: “Come at once if you want to see brother living.”

The jury rendered the following verdict: “We find for the plaintiff two- hundred and fifty dollars punitive damages.”

The defendant appealed upon the following exception: “The Court erred in refusing to' set aside the verdict and order a new trial, when, from the finding taken in connection with the charge of the Judge,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doster v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. NortonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. City of Sumter v. HoganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  2. Deese v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Limehouse v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Harry L. Hussman Refrigerator & Supply Co. v. Cash & Carry Grocer, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Dykema Ex Rel. Estate of Dykema v. Carolina Emergency Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API