Legal Opinion
White v. Mac Air Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 24, 1996No. 9502-00969; CA A89541PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint for a lack of personal jurisdiction over Mac Air Corporation, a Kansas corporation.1 We reverse in part and remand.
Plaintiff has the burden of alleging and proving facts necessary to establish personal jurisdiction over defendant. State ex rel Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. Pope, 317 Or 151, 153, 854 P2d 461 (1993). In making findings as to the existence of those facts, the trial court may base its determination on the allegations in the pleadings and the evidence submitted by both parties. Management Recruiters v. Harold Moore & Assoc.,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Hydraulic Servocontrols Corp. v. DaleOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mains v. II Morrow, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. Mac Air Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997