Shelly Varner v. United Auto Workers, UAW Local 1853, and General Motors, LLC.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION SHELLY VARNER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 1:25-cv-00050 v. ) ) JUDGE CAMPBELL UNITED AUTO WORKERS, UAW ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOLMES LOCAL 1853, and GENERAL MOTORS, ) LLC., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant General Motors, LLC’s (“GM”) motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 24), brought under Federal Rule of Civil 12(c). Plaintiff Shelly Varner (“Varner”) filed a response in opposition. (Doc. No. 28). GM did not file a reply. For the reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Winget v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.