Legal Opinion

Claim of Paoletti v. Ellis & Kustell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 14, 2000, which ruled that claimant was entitled to a schedule loss of use award rather than permanent partial disability benefits.

In December 1993, claimant filed for workers’ compensation benefits claiming that she suffered from carpal tunnel syndrome in both hands and wrists as a result of constant and repetitive typing. By decision filed June 30, 1994, occupational disease, notice and causal relationship were established for both wrists, benefits were awarded at a tentative reduced earnings rate from December 15, 1993…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Clifford v. Larkin RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Claim of Jett v. Lew Mark Baking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Claim of Pedro v. Liberty Lines ExpressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Haight v. EdisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Claim of Winns v. Local 1199 Health & Human Services Employees UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API