Legal Opinion

MacNeal v. Equinamics Corp. (In Re MacNeal)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided September 9, 2008No. 18-20435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY SANCTIONS PENDING REVIEW BY THE COURT OF APPEALS, GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING CHARGING LIEN, DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY SUPERSEDEAS BOND, AND DENYING REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

JOHN K. OLSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING is before me for consideration after further briefing which I had requested at the hearing held March 3, 2008, on: (1) Tabas, Freedman, Soloff & Miller, P.A.’s (“TFS & M”) Motion to Approve Stipulation Regarding Charging Lien [DE 206]; (2) Plaintiff Bruce Donald MacNeal’s (“Mac-Neal”) Motion to Modify Supersedeas Bond by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. BaucomSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Daniel Mones, PA v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. United States v. Transocean Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Miller v. ScobieSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Macco Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015
  2. In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
  3. Miami Beverly, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API