Legal Opinion

Timucuan Properties, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 1, 2014No. 5D13-2020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

AFFIRMED. See Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla. 1927) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene.”); see also Peninsular Naval Stores Co. v. Cox, 49 So. 191, 194 (Fla.1909); SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, 419 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Intermediary Finance Corporation v. McKaySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown National BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Sadco, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bymel v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Bonafide Properties v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Trust No. 602W0 Dated 7/16/15, DEMA Investments, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Mirabella Owners' Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Bonafide Properties v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API