Legal Opinion

Poirier v. Raad

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 4, 1995No. 93-0676Published

1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.

*266INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of the termination of the parties’ three-year relationship during which both parties cohabited in plaintiffs home. The relationship ended in 1992, when defendant vacated the residence. Plaintiff seeks to recover certain personalty which she alleges defendant wrongfully removed from her residence. Plaintiff further seeks to recover compensation for personal services she allegedly rendered to defendant and to recover monies defendant allegedly wrongfully removed from their joint bank accounts.

Defendant has asserted counterclaims against plaintiff. In Count…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. De Cicco v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API