Legal Opinion

Toro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2008No. 06-17160Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Nidia I. Toro (“Toro”) and her son Alejandro G. Toro appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of the government on their claims for medical malpractice and loss of consortium under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. After a bench trial, the court issued its findings pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and conclusions of law de novo. Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

First, Toro challenges the court’s holding that the Feres…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Hickey v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Savarese v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API