Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1992No. 91-K-2731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Defendants, Norman Smith and Gerald Young, were charged with three counts of burglary of an inhabited dwelling, violations of La.R.S. 14:62.2. On December 16, 1991, a hearing was held on the defendants’ motions to suppress confessions and identification. The trial judge, after hearing the testimony of several police officers, granted defendant Young’s motion to suppress the identification.1 The state now complains of this ruling.2

On September 23, 1991, at approximately 9:00 A.M., Officer Michael Melton received a call of a suspicious vehicle matching the description furnished…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. ValentineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. State v. WaltersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. State v. PetersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. State v. EverridgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LaymonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API