Legal Opinion
In Re Florence Commercial Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1927No. 5048PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 F.2d 468 (1927)
In re FLORENCE COMMERCIAL CO.
TRUMAN, County Treasurer of Pinal County, Ariz., et al.
v.
THALHEIMER.
No. 5048.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 23, 1927.
Andrew R. Lynch, Sp. Counsel, Dept. of Atty. Gen., and Ernest W. McFarland, Co. Atty., of Florence, Ariz., for appellants.
Henderson Stockton, Allan K. Perry, and Joseph E. Noble, all of Phnix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before HUNT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
On October 24, 1926, the appellant George E. Truman, county treasurer of Pinal county, Ariz., acting in pursuance of the statutes of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Wood and HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In re KallakDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1906
- Truman v. ThalheimerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- City and County of Denver v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Klebanoff v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
- In the Matter of Brokol Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt. Appeal of Louis Freeman, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- In Re California Pea Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.