Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. Ostrander

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1934No. 24477. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— The parties to this action were divorced by final decree entered January 17, 1930, which decree confirmed the provisions of an interlocutory decree theretofore entered. Those provisions, so far as now material, granted a divorce to the plaintiff wife, gave her the custody of the minor child with the right in the defendant to visit the child, and directed the defendant to pay seventy-five dollars per month for a specified period for the support of the plaintiff and the child, and thereafter to pay fifty dollars per month in semi-monthly installments for the support of the child.

In June,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re DayWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Flagg v. FlaggWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Eliason v. EliasonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. Richard C.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Selvey v. SelveyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API