Legal Opinion

In re Mead-Haskell Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 9, 1942No. 1553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Petition for reorganization was filed May 19th, 1939. The estate consists largely of real estate, approximately 171 parcels improved in most part by dwelling houses; approximately 49 vacant parcels; it has record title to 131 parcels; and held under contract of purchase approximately 40 parcels. Under a plan called “1% per month plan (i. e.) the purchaser to pay 1% of the purchase price cash, and 1% per month, thereafter until the full price is paid”, sales were made, and 44 parcels were sold; eight of said parcels have been deeded, and trust deeds taken for the unpaid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  2. Conley v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Mead-Haskell Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API