Legal Opinion
Russo v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 4, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1417PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
Is the licensing ordinance of the City of Tucson as it relates to attorneys valid? That is the question presented on appeal. The lower court answered this question in the affirmative and we agree.
The appellants, members in good standing of the State Bar of Arizona and practicing attorneys in the City of Tucson, instituted this action alleging in substance that the licensing provisions of the Tucson City Code as related to attorneys were in violation of A.R.S. §§ 32-201 through 32-275 and the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona, 17 A.R.S. in particular Rules 27…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Application of GalushaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- McCarthy v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Sandstrom v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mire v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Union Transportes De Nogales v. City of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. BermanNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991