Legal Opinion

In Re Burtman Estate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 1, 1949No. 3808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

“All property within the jurisdiction of the state . . . belonging to domiciliarles of the state . . . which shall pass by will, or by the laws regulating intestate succession ... to any person . . . except . . . the . . . wife . . . shall be subject to a tax.” R. L., c. 87, s. 1, as amended by Laws 1945, c. 3, s. 1, and c. 144, s. 1. The State claims that under this statute it acted correctly in assessing a tax on the residue of the estate before any deduction caused by the compromise agreement. The weight of authority supports this position, although the authorities are not unanimous.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cochran's Ex'or and Trustee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Cress'estateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In Re the Estate of RendslandWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Department of Revenue v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API