People v. Bartlett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52) and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of forcible touching (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Pursuant to Penal Law § 130.52, a person is guilty of forcible touching when he or she “intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, forcibly touches the sexual or other intimate parts of another person for the purpose of,” inter alia,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People v. LaddNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aguilar v. WishnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- People v. StroudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- EDWARDS, WALTER M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- F.,SHANNON, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- JONES, ALAN L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.