Legal Opinion

State v. Blazak

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1973No. 1976-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Defendant, Mitchell Thomas Blazak, was convicted of robbery, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-641, and assault to commit murder, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-248, in the Superi- or Court of Pima County, Arizona, and appeals.

The facts necessary for the determination of the appeal show that on June 14, 1967, after defendant had been arrested and arraigned in the Superior Court, a Rule 250 hearing was held, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., in which it was determined he was so mentally incapacitated as to be unable to assist in his defense. He was, accordingly, committed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. BradleyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. MaysArizona Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell Thomas Blazak, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James R. Ricketts, Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-Ap Pellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. State of Arizona v. Anthony LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HehmanArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API