Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Pacific S. S. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 18, 1924No. 8521PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

' (after stating the facts as above). The petition on removal prima facie fixes the jurisdiction in this court, which continues until it is established to a “legal certainty” that the court is without jurisdiction. Hill v. Walker, 167 F. 241, 92 C. C. A. 633, certiorari denied 214 U. S. 517, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1064, followed by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit in Big Sespe Oil Co. v. Cochran, 276 F. 216. The above is the substance of the record as to the citizenship of the plaintiff. The petition on removal asserts the plaintiff to be a citizen of the state of Oregon. This…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. Nationwide Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API