Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Leisure Automotive Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1996No. A96A0911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Leisure Automotive Corporation (“the broker”) entered into a three-year contract with Leisure Guide of America, Inc. (“Leisure Guide”), for exclusive rights to sell Leisure Guide’s customized vans and trucks. The broker promised to provide Leisure Guide with at least 90 purchase orders per month, pay Leisure Guide liquidated damages — based on the number of orders short of this quota, or forfeit a significant portion of its sales territory.

Less then five months after executing the brokerage agreement, Leisure Guide posted a letter to the broker’s principal agents,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Mansell v. Benson Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Fried v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Harden v. Vertex Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API