Legal Opinion
Peart v. Jones
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1953No. 33012Published
1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.
The only ground of reversal urged in this court is misconduct of the jury. The question submitted is stated by the defendant-appellant as follows :
“Does an offer to a juror of a thing of substantial value, in return for signing a verdict for plaintiff, such offer being made during the trial and to one of nine *140jurors who thereafter signed a verdict for plaintiff, require the granting of a new trial?”
• This case is free of doubt as to whether a bribe was offered to the juror. On the basis of the conversation with Mrs. Kinnan, which is recited in her affidavit, George Bryan was indicted for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- State v. BerschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Akin v. Lake Superior Consolidated Iron MinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Callahan v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.