Legal Opinion
People v. Atencio
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 12, 1974No. 26152PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle
On January 19, 1972, defendant-appellant Atencio pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon, and on September 7, 1972, he was granted probation. On April 23, 1973, Atencio was arrested and held for violation of his probation. Prior to his probation revocation hearing, Atencio filed a motion to suppress illegally seized evidence. The court ruled that it would not consider the motion, stating that the so-called “exclusionary” rule, originally announced in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), is not applicable to a probation revocation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Gerald Duane VandemarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- People v. DoweryIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Dulin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.