Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Associated Cab Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1964No. 40754, 40755PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

We shall consider the main bill of exceptions first. Special ground 2 contends that the court erred in giving the following charge to the jury: “The plaintiff, however, in order to recover against a defendant is not required to prove every allegation of negligence charged against such defendant. If the plaintiff proves by the evidence that a defendant committed one or more of such allegations of negligence this would be sufficient insofar as proof of negligence is concerned.” It is argued that this charge was tantamount to an instruction that a recovery for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dowis v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Trammell v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lester v. S. J. Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Johnson v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron-Workers, Local 387 v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Meacham v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Barnes v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API