Legal Opinion
Teeter v. City of Edmond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 3, 2004No. 99,158PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 This controversy presents two primary issues. The first is whether summary judgment was properly granted to the City of Edmond on Plaintiffs claim that she was injured because of an improperly maintained crosswalk. The second is whether the University of Central Oklahoma owed Plaintiff a duty to install additional traffic signs to create a different and safer crosswalk on a public street not maintained by the University. We answer the first in the negative. Summary judgment should not have been granted on her claim against the City. We answer the second question also in the negative, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Nail v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Barker v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Moran v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- GOWENS v. BARSTOWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Sutherlin v. Independent School District No. 40District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.