Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Friend

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1992No. 91CA1131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Betrett Gardner, a claimant in a workers’ ,. ,. compensation case, brought this proceeding under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), seeking to have the district court prohibit the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the workers’ compensation proceeding from denying discovery of certain directives to physicians instructing the manner of treating compensation patients. He alleges these documents are relevant to the workers’ compensation claim. The district court dismissed the action, finding that it lacked jurisdiction under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) to review the ALJ’s evidentiary ruling.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zappas v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Vigil v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API