Legal Opinion

Palama v. Livaudais

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1935No. 33442PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

On the 14th of February, 1929, Harvey E. Roberts entered into an agreement to buy from Livaudais & Livaudais, agents for an undisclosed principal, 14 lots, ndmbered 6 to 19, both inclusive, in a subdivision of land belonging to Palama. The price stipulated was $5,200, of which $2,-500 was to be paid in cash, and $2,700 to be represented by three promissory notes, for $900 each, payable in one, two, and three years. The firm of Livaudais S. Livaudais was succeeded in the real estate business by Livaudais & Cazzetta. On the 1st day of March, 1929, Livaudais & Cazzetta…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palama v. LivaudaisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. TauzinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Pelican Printing Co. v. PecotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Roddy v. Norco Local 4-750, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoughtyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API