Legal Opinion

Kitner v. Whitlock

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

Appellee brought an action of assumpsit, on a promissory note, against appellant and Sampson, John K. and George W. Fanning. There was a special count on the note, and the common counts, in the declaration. The defendants all pleaded the general issue, and appellant filed a plea of non est factum verified by affidavit. On these issues a trial was had before the court, without a jury, by consent of the parties, resulting in a finding and judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant Kitner appeals to this court and urges a reversal.

The evidence shows that the three Fannings, with Kitner,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. J. Crable & Son v. O'connorWyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rigdon v. ConleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Nagle v. SchnadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API