Legal Opinion
United States v. James M. Fejes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2000No. 99-30144PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
James M. Fejes appeals from the judgment entered following his felony convictions for conspiracy to violate the Lacey Act under 18 U.S.C. § 371, and two substantive violations of the Lacey Act under 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a)(2)(A), 3373(d)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The jury found that Fejes sold caribou in violation of the Lacey Act by providing guide services to two hunters that took the caribou in violation of Alaska law. Fejes contends that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury that the illegal taking of the caribou must have preceded his sale of guide…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James Gerald BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Micky Joe Vaandering, United States of America v. Jeffrey Wayne McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Castellanos-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Javid NaghaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Carmelo Bello-Bahena, United States of America v. Carmelo Bello-BahenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Marcos Alonzo HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Rivera-AlonzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.