New York Security & Trust Co. v. Louisville, E. & St. L. Consol. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
This was a hearing on exceptions to the master’s report on the amended intervening petition of Otis Kimball and 29 others, holders of the bonds of the Huntingburg, Tell City & Canneiton Railroad Company, to compel the delivery to them, in exchange for their bonds, of bonds of the defendant the Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad Company. The principal suit is one for the foreclosure of mortgages against the defendant company.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
The petitioners have filed their petition, on behalf of themselves and of all others similarly situated, to compel the Kew York Security & Trust Company and George T. Jarvis, receiver of the Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad Company, and also receiver of its constituent companies, to deliver to them certain bonds executed by the consolidated com*227pany, bearing date July 1,1889, in exchange for bonds, held by them, issued by the Huntingburg, Tell City & Caimelton Railroad Company. The material facts are these:
October 1, 1887, the Huntingburg, Tell…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- MacKall v. CasilearSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lober v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Barnes v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917