Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Sixth District Court of the parish of East Baton Rouge, Burk, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.

This appeal is taken by the defendant, Daniel Hickey, from a judgment in which he has been condemned to pay the whole amount of two notes, one for $2,500 and the other for $550, to the plaintiff, who is the executor of James MeCalop.

*420The notes are signed thus: “ Caldwell & Eickey." One is dated in Decem-her, 1848, and the other in February, 1S49. Both were protested for non-pay-nient, and were taken up by McCalop>, who was the surety in the former note, and the endorser of the other.

It was Caldwell, who wrote the signatures of those notes. The ground upon which Eickey was held liable for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parker v. BrashaerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harding v. WattigneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. In re MansfieldDistrict Court, D. Louisiana · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API