Legal Opinion
Loney v. MHA v. Aetna
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 18, 1995No. CV-92-461-BPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Loney v. MHA v. Aetna CV-92-461-B 08/18/95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE H. Loney Construction Co., Inc. v. Manchester Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Civil No. 92-461-B Aetna Casualty and Surety Corporation O R D E R Manchester Housing and Redevelopment Authority ("MHRA") moves for summary judgment on its claim for attorney's fees pursuant to a performance bond. Specifically, MHRA argues that it is entitled to the costs associated with defending against H. Loney Construction's claims for extra compensation due to a differing site condition because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gamble v. University SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- B & H Const. & Supply Co., Inc. v. Dist. Bd. of Trustess, Tallahassee Com. College of Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- R. Zoppo Co. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Logic Associates, Inc. v. Time Share Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Parkhurst v. GibsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.