French v. Applied Psychology Group of Texoma, PA
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBERLY C. PRIEST JOHNSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion & Brief to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 4). Upon review of the motion and responsive briefing, the Court finds that the Motion is DENIED.1
I. BACKGROUND
Patricia French (“Plaintiff’) filed suit on November 10, 2016, asserting causes of action associated with her employment as a receptionist for The Applied Psychology Group of Texoma, PA (“Defendant”). See Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs claims are brought under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (“TCHRA”) and the Federal Age…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Lane v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Truman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- CleanCOALition v. TXU POWERCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. St. Charles Parish Housing Authority Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020