Legal Opinion

Curry v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1986No. Appeal, No. 14 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Clarence Curry (claimant) appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a referee’s denial of benefits. We affirm.

The claimant was employed by Purex Industries Inc. (Purex) as a liquid detergent case stacker from August 19, 1963 through September 30, 1984. He was laid off on August 7, 1984. In a letter dated August 10,1984, the claimant was recalled by Purex, effective August 20, 1984, to the position of case-dumper, indexer, liquid detergent on the swing shift.

By a letter dated August 16, 1984, the claimant declined the recall for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houff Transfer, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Lynn v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Brullo v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Wigfield v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Teitell v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Teitell v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API