Pierne v. Valentine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
These are three separate applications pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. Orders are sought against the Police Commissioner of the city of New York, the Chief Inspector commanding Brooklyn West and Richmond of the Police Department, or any other police official “prohibiting them and each of them from proceeding with the hearing of charges and specifications dated April 17, 1942, filed against * * * ” petitioners with the Police Department of the city of New York.
1. Petitioner Pierne filed, on March 16, 1942, an application for retirement to take effect at midnight on said day.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Gen. Reinsurance Corp. v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- McMeekan v. Department of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Matter of McMeekan v. Dept. of Hlt. of the City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dobler v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1961