Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of Control

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1990No. 85-09-20, 517-L; CA A47525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs petition for review of our decision, 103 Or App 253, 798 P2d 673 (1990), contending that we should not have reversed the trial court’s decision that the Owyhee Project Joint Committee is the agent for the nine irrigation districts. The Joint Committee also petitions for review, asserting that we erroneously concluded that it is not a public body subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA). We treat the petitions as petitions for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, deny plaintiffs’ petition and allow that of the Joint Committee.

Plaintiffs contend that we erred in holding that, as a matter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of ControlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samuel v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Ricciardi v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of ControlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Schultz v. Bank of the WestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API