Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Augusta

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1942No. 36471Published

1ConcurrenceO’Niell, Chief Justice

In a criminal prosecution, proof of an admission made by the defendant, tending to incriminate him, is admissible, not merely to impeach his testimony if he has testified in the case, but also to prove his guilt. Statements made by other witnesses before the trial, inconsistent with their testimony on the trial, are only hearsay evidence, except for the purpose of discrediting the witness. Proof of such previous statements is not offered for the purpose of proving the fact or facts stated previously by the witness, but is .offered for the purpose' only of discrediting the testimony given by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CloughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. State v. MahfouzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API