Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 11, 1994No. Docket No. 15476-92Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL B. COURTNEY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Courtney v. Commissioner

Docket No. 15476-92

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-502; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 510; 68 T.C.M. (CCH) 908;

October 11, 1994, Filed

Decision will be entered in accordance with the stipulation of settled issues.

For petitioner: Mel Lamelas.

For respondent: Wayne A. S. Hamilton.

TANNENWALD

TANNENWALD

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TANNENWALD, Judge: Respondent, by separate notices, determined deficiencies in, and additions to, petitioner's Federal income taxes as follows:

Additions to Tax under I.R.C. Secs. 1

Yea…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Patronik-Holder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. First Security Bank of Idaho, N. A. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Michael P. Georges v. U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API