Legal Opinion

Calciano v. Kijakazi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00367Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID CALCIANO, : Civil No. 1:23-CV-367 : Plaintiff : : v. : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) : MARTIN O’MALLEY,1 : Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction In the instant case we are called upon to apply two central tenets of Social Security law—one which is a longstanding principle and the second which is a concept of more recent vintage. The longstanding principle which guides us in this case is the deferential standard of review that applies when considering Social Security…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API