Legal Opinion
In Re Bartelini
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 2, 2010No. 18-12046PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
DIANE DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The above-captioned cases are before the Court by virtue of the objections to confirmation of the debtors’ respective Chapter 13 plans made pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B) by Mark W. Swime-lar, Esq., Chapter 13 Trustee (“Trustee”). 1 The question raised by the Trustee is whether Mary Ellen Bartelini, Douglas William Earl, Jr. and Susan Dorene Earl, and Nelson D. Tanner, Jr. and Judy E. Tanner (collectively, “Debtors”) have committed all of their “projected disposable income” (“PDI”) during the “applicable commitment period”…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re AlexanderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re WelshUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2010
- Culp v. Stanziale (In re Culp)District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- In Re ArlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2011
- In re SutticeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.