State v. Parvin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
In this criminal appeal, Leslie Parvin argues the trial court erred in allowing inadmissible hearsay testimony from two witnesses. We affirm.
FACTS
Parvin was indicted on two counts of murder related to the deaths of Edgar Lopez and Pablo Guzman-Gutierrez. The State tried the case under the theory that Parvin solicited Lopez for sex and then killed Lopez and Gutierrez in retaliation when Lopez refused him later in the night. Parvin argued self-defense.
Motion In Limine
Immediately prior to trial, Parvin made a motion in limine to exclude any testimony referring to other crimes, wrongs, or bad…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. LadnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018