Legal Opinion
Sterling Factors Corp. v. Freeman
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William R. Brennan, Jr., J.
These two actions seek to enforce guarantees of the indebtedness of Brillium Metals Corporation (and of the same corporation as a debtor in possession in reorganization proceedings) given by the defendants Max Freeman and Anita Freeman, his wife, and to foreclose a mortgage on their home given by them to the plaintiff to secure the guarantees.
Brillium, a manufacturer of plastic housewares and giftware, and the plaintiff had entered into an accounts receivable financing agreement and a factor’s lien agreement in 1960. When Brillium became involved in financial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wigand v. . Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cohen v. RossmooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Humphrey v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- New Netherlands Bank v. DernburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacK Financial Corp. v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Chemical Bank v. PIC Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sterling Factors Corp. v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Martin v. MakowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Royal Business Funds Corp. v. EhrlichNew York Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.