McConn v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
Opinion by
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · BellChief Justice Bell
I concur in the result but very strongly disagree with the Majority’s statement that the credibility of a witness is solely for the jury and never for the Court. For this proposition, the Majority rely upon Springer v. Allegheny Co., 401 Pa. 557, 560, 165 A. 2d 383. In the Springer case, no authority was cited for such a statement, and it is contrary to almost all human and judicial experience,* and should certainly be instantly overruled.
In many cases, how is it possible for a trial Judge to say that a verdict was against the weight of the evidence, without taking into…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Clewell v. PummerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.