Legal Opinion

People v. Traylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in granting the People’s challenge for cause of a prospective juror. Prospective jurors have a duty to answer voir dire questions truthfully (see, People v Cephus, 224 AD2d 706, 707; see also, Holland v Blake, 38 AD2d 344, 345-346, affd 31 NY2d 734). In the case of a challenge for cause of an unsworn juror, a trial court “should lean toward disqualifying a prospective juror of dubious impartiality” (People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645, 651). The record establishes that the juror failed to disclose a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BranchNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Holland v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Holland v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. People v. CephusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. WEST, NICHOLAS A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API