Norman v. Cammack
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Ashley Circuit Court; H. ,W. Wells, Judge; reversed. 1. It was error to overule the demurrer to the amended and. substituted answer. Cammack was barred. Kirby’s Dig., § 6220; 83 Ark. 161; 16. 454. 2. Instruction No. 3 for defendant was erroneous. The question of no consideration was not in issue.
1Opinion of the CourtFrauenthal, J.
This is ah action instituted by M. F. Norman, the plaintiff below, upon a note executed to her by the defendants. The note was for $3,800, dated February 20, 1906, and due January 1, following. It was signed by A. W. Cammack Company, W. T. Files, J. C. Norman and A. W. Cammack. The suit was instituted against the makers of the note, and was made returnable at the January, 1909, term of the circuit court. At that term of the court W. T. Files filed an answer, and the case as to him was continued. Judgment by default was then taken against the remaining defendants. Subsequently, during the same…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Montague v. CraddockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968