Penagos v. Capital Bank
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.
The main question before us is when the statute of limitations begins to run where there has been nonpayment of a certificate of deposit. We conclude that it begins to run upon the date of written demand by the depositor, after the certificate has matured. We therefore reverse the summary judgment which held the suit to be time-barred.
I
In September 1988, plaintiff-appellant Rogelio Penagos opened a certificate of deposit at defendant-appellee Capital Bank. The maturity date was December 27, 1988. After maturity plaintiff inquired periodically about the funds, and was assured that they would…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Melendez v. Dreis and Krump Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Ana Maria Edelmann v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016