Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Carter

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 30, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order, entered May 26, 2005, reversed, without costs, landlords’ motion denied and matter remanded for further proceedings.

This summary eviction proceeding, premised upon allegations that tenant overcharged a roommate (respondent Sheppard) in violation of Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2525.7, is not ripe for summary disposition. Even assuming for purposes of this appeal that the relationship between the tenant and Sheppard was that of roommates even though designated as that of tenant and subtenant in their March 2000 written agreement (compare Ishida v Markowicz, 18…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gibson v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Ishida v. MarkowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API