Legal Opinion

Veasey v. Peters

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1917No. 22435Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; T. C. W. Ellis, Judge. Suit by Thomas Yeasey against Henry Peters, Eugene Peters, and the ¿Etna Life Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

LECHE, J.

[4] Viewing the question of law upon which this case was decided, with the additional light shed upon it by reargument of counsel, we have, after mature 'consideration, reached the conclusion that our-former decree is erroneous.

That decree rests entirely upon the interpretation which we placed upon the cases of Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205, 37 Sup. Ct. 524, 61 L. Ed. 1086, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 900, and Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek, 234 U. S. 52, 34 Sup. Ct. 733, 58 L. Ed. 1208, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1157.

It must be observed that the statute of this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Bass v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API