Legal Opinion

Old Dominion S. S. Co. v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 28, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

It is not thought necessary to analyze the affidavits submitted. The documentary facts are not in dispute, and neither are most of the other facts in the sense of things seen or said; but the affiants have attached an intent or purpose to what their opponents said or suffered to be done, and no one can ever arrive at a reasonably satisfactory solution of this question of intent or purpose until witnesses have been cross-examined. It may be summarily stated that I rega'rd this case as eminently suitable for equity,' in that the plaintiff has nothing that can be called a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Commercial Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Highland Nav. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  2. Howmet Corporation v. Tokyo Shipping Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. Femmer v. City of JuneauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Manhattan Lighterage Corp. v. Moore-McCormack Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API