Legal Opinion

Rich v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The female plaintiff, a passenger, hereinafter called the plaintiff, sues in tort for injuries sustained in a subway station by reason of being knocked down by children whom the defendant, it is alleged, had “negligently permitted to play on the platform unheeded and unchecked for a considerable period of time.” Her husband sues in tort for consequential damages. At the conclusion of the evidence the judge granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in each case.

The plaintiff was the only one to testify on her own behalf. • On March 7, 1941, she rode on an elevated train from Boston…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kuhlen v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Glennen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. McFadden v. Bancroft Hotel Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Holton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Fortier v. Hibernian Building Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rawson v. Massachusetts Operating Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Sharpe v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Fisher v. RobbinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Heps v. Burdine's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Greco v. Sumner Tavern Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API